ThoughtFarmer Blog


Content Migration: the Iceberg of Intranet Projects

It lies there just over the horizon and just below the surface of any new intranet implementation. It is the factor that is most often forgotten or ignored as the intranet barrels toward launch. It is often left out of the project plan altogether but can take longer than the build itself. It is content migration.

It’s easy to understand why migrating content from your old system to a new intranet is overlooked:

Content migration is underestimated and misunderstood.

Many organizations moving to a new intranet have never been through a migration before and get blindsided by the amount of coordination and planning required to get through it

Content migration is hidden.

When some consultants are bidding on work, they don’t want to raise the issue because it may balloon the timeline or costs vs. their competitors.

I can see our intranet from my house

Big intranet? Big migration issue.

Content migration is ugly.

Put simply, content migration is not attractive. Who wants to think about copying and pasting content or writing migration scripts when you can spend your time admiring your site’s new visual design or playing with the new features of a recently installed intranet software package?

For all the reasons to ignore the inevitable, the truth remains that failure to adequately strategize, plan, schedule, and budget for content migration can easily sink your intranet project. Failure to plan can lead to delays as the content migration drags past the launch date. Conflicts can occur as extra resources are called upon at the last minute to attempt to migrate mountains of web pages into the new system. After all of the hard work your team has put into designing and building the new system, content migration is the last hurdle — one that you don’t want to underestimate.

Here are some guidelines that ThoughtFarmer Professional Services uses to work with our clients to help ensure a smooth migration and an on-time launch.

Include content migration in the project plan.

Time is required to consider and draft a migration strategy and approach document and to modify it as the project progresses and decisions are made. Time is required for the migration itself. Because the project plan is written early in the process, it is necessary to be very conservative and even pessimistic in the amount of time required.

Determine if the migration approach is to be Automated vs. Manual vs. Hybrid.

Depending on the systems involved, it may be possible to automate the movement of content between systems. If the original intranet is a CMS or the original content is very structured and the content organization is to change little in the new site, then it may be possible to write a script that reformats the original content and populates the new content repository. Most scenarios, however, involve a manual copy/paste job into the new system. Scenarios where a single site has content physically residing in multiple environments may utilize a hybrid manual/automated approach for different sections of the site.

Resourcing for migration should be addressed early in the project.

The best case scenario has resources dedicated to the task until it is completed. To achieve this, resources need to be booked in advance so that regular duties can be cleared or reassigned for the period.

I have heard of some organizations outsourcing the content migration activity. I don’t recommend this because it distances the organization from taking ownership of its content and denies the opportunity for the content contributors to learn the new intranet inside and out prior to launch.

Reduce the scope of migration through ruthless pruning of the content inventory.

The simplest way to reduce the time required for content migration is to leave any outdated or unimportant content behind in the old system. Organizations should only migrate relevant content to the new CMS.

Only migrate relevant content.

Think about before, during, and after.

The Content Migration Approach document should address content transformations that need to take place before migration begins, during migration, and once the content is in the new system.

Pre-migration: Reduce the inventory, determine URLs to grandfather, do a final update of the content before migration. If automated scripts are to be used, these should be tested and put through a dry run before the real thing.

During migration: What needs to be done to get the content into the new system? Regardless, this should be done during a content freeze – more on this below.

Post migration: What type of clean-up needs to be done once it is migrated? Often hyperlinks fall into this category as frequently the final URL (or link variables that render a final URL at run time) are not known until all content is in the new system.

Negotiate and communicate the nature of the content freeze before migration begins.

Migration occurs best if the content on the “source” site is not being updated while content is being replicated in the new system. This entails a freeze or ban on updating the website for the migration period.

Every organization has different needs with respect to the ability to update their intranet. Highly collaborative organizations will find any content freeze painful, while a freeze at an institution or government department might pass by unnoticed. Any content freeze should be clear on the start and end times that apply, any exempt content to which updates are permitted, how exempt content will be “caught up” in the new intranet, and who should be consulted if a mission critical issue comes up that warrants an emergency intranet update.

Foster a focused, goal-oriented, teamwork-based culture for the migration team. Assuming you have a dedicated team to copy/paste content, likely seconded from their regular duties, you need to keep the team focused and motivated. I suggest the following tools:

The War Room

Have dedicated facilities where the migration team can work together free from distractions.

Set goals and chart progress

A thermometer on the wall charts should be used to chart progress as the team ploughs through the content. Daily goals should be set for the team and each person so that migration is paced for the entire period.

Have an issue resolution process in place

The team should take advantage of each other to solve any problems that arise. If issues cannot be resolved in this way, tools should be in place to track minor bugs and a contact should be designated if a show stopper issue comes up.

Have little rewards and thank you prizes on hand

The migration team leader should give out little prizes to people who exceed their target, are really helpful at helping others solve problems or are great leaders. Keeping morale high will be important if a lengthy migration period is required.

Through careful planning and preparation and closely tracking progress during the migration itself, you can keep your intranet migration on track by navigating around the content migration iceberg.

This is a modified version of a post that originally appeared on the OpenRoad blog.

Posted in Featured, Intranets  

How a pie chart helped me fall in love with our clients all over again

I made a pie chart for our planning meeting last week:

Pie I have eaten vs. Pie I have not eaten

Whoops, wrong chart. I meant this one:

Revenue breakdown

At first, I thought to myself, “Okay, nothing new here. New sales dominate our revenue.”

But then I noticed that the revenue divides into two logical groups: creating new relationships, and maintaining and deepening existing relationships:

Revenue breakdown, grouped by new vs existing relationships

When I grouped it in this way, it became obvious that our biggest source of revenue comes from maintaining and deepening relationships with our existing clients — people who have already paid us a license fee.

This is to be expected for subscription-based software, but less so for us. We’re a growth company, and our pricing model is an up-front licensing fee for a perpetual license, followed by a much smaller software maintenance fee in future years. New sales are still very important — all existing clients were once new clients — but existing clients need more of our focus.

To that end, we’ve created an internal “Client Services Team” with representatives from Support, Professional Services, Development, and Sales & Marketing. Our goal: 100% referenceable clients, 100% of the time.

It took a pie chart to make that happen.

(As an aside, I recently read The Back of the Napkin: Solving Problems and Selling Ideas with Pictures by Dan Roam. I now have a renewed interest in doodling for fun and profit, and the above pie chart started as a sketch. Thanks Dan.)

Posted in Featured, ThoughtFarmer  

Social Interaction Design Webinar Q&A

We had a couple of questions that came out of last week’s webinar on Social Interaction Design with Thomas Vander Wal. Thomas took the time to put together responses and we’re sharing them here.

EphraimJF: How do you address information flow needs for both vertical and horizontal organizational structures?

Thomas Vander Wal: The multi-directional flows can be addressed in a few ways. The first is people acting to direct the flow by tagging or writing pointers in other affinity areas. Tagging provides the means to add context for groups with different interests and key terms. Writing quick posts pointing to something that may be of interest or needs to be seen is one good way.

The second is having an area, page or service where a group can curate what has been found through search, aggregation tools (feeds or alert searches), or found through people who cross purpose.

Last is using feeds of searches or filters to automatically populate pages. Paying attention to other group’s flows on terms that have know interest or affinity.

Josh Glover: We’re trying to source a group of volunteers to gather feedback on ideas for our new intranet – one concern is that we’ll be full of people who will be easy adopters. Any suggestions on how we identify who might be the laggards up front, so we can see what they might want to see and attempt to address that group with initial design/roll-out.

Thomas Vander Wal: One of the better ways of ensuring those outside the early adopters get included is to ask the known early adopters to make a list of people who they continually are helping grasp the new things. This identifies who the next stage adopters or the group after that will be.

Also dig into the ecosystem of how things are done now outside of the tools. Most organizations have one or two central node people who are the ones who act as liaison to new tech or are the person through whom the informal information flows go through. They will be able to help map not only who the next round of adopters are, but they may be able to identify who the experts are as well. Finding experts are hard as they often are not the users of the new social or communication tools, but it is the broadcaster or rebroadcasts of their info that are much more easily seen. The experts are usually overly busy and do not have interest in attracting more attention or work. If you can get the experts into the early rounds or the broadcasters or rebroadcasting types, that would be really helpful.

One thing to keep in mind is those who are often central nodes for communication may be a tough sell as they like their role and the tools as they are as they have value for themselves tied into it.

—————-

Thanks again to Thomas Vander Wal of InfoCloud Solutions and to all of our participants for joining us.

Look for upcoming ThoughtFarmer sponsored webinar announcements on our mailing list or posted here to our blog.

Posted in Events, Social software  

Presentation Slides for Social Interaction Design with Thomas Vander Wal

Thomas Vander Wal shared some of his experience and insights today with webinar attendees from around the world on the subject of social interaction design. He presented on the myths of social software, what social comfort means in organizations, and his models of describing social interaction design.

Below are the slides from the session:

UPDATED Apr 16/10: And now the recorded video:

Overcoming Enterprise 2.0 Adoption Hurdles with Social Interaction Design from Gordon Ross on Vimeo.

You can also view tweets from the session courtesy of Twitter and the hashtag #TFsxd.

We’re compiling a couple of questions and answers from the session and Thomas will expand on those in the next day or two.

Thanks again to those who participated and hope you can join us for another ThoughtFarmer webinar in the near future.

Posted in Events, Social software, ThoughtFarmer  

“Our intranet is like underwater ballet: kinda lovely, mostly useless.”

Enjoy this slideshow of the best postcards from our viral marketing campaign, Intranet Secrets.

Posted in Events, Featured, Intranets, ThoughtFarmer  

Want us to stay in touch?


Have a question for us?

We'd love to answer it for you! Call 1-888-694-3999 or fill out our contact form and we'll respond right away.