ThoughtFarmer Blog


Speaker profile: Rachel Happe, Community Management, at Social Intranet Summit #SISV

Rachel Happe, Co-Founder & Principal at the Community Roundtable

Rachel Happe is a Co-Founder and Principal at The Community Roundtable, a peer network for social media, community, and social business leaders. She has over fifteen years of experience working with emerging technologies including enterprise social networking, ecommerce, and enterprise software applications. Rachel has served as a product executive at Mzinga, Bitpass, & IDe, and as IDC’s first analyst covering social technologies. Rachel started her business career as an analyst at PRTM. Rachel is a GigaOm Pro Analyst and serves on Social Media Today’s Blogger Board, the Enterprise 2.0 Conference Advisory Board, and as an Isis Parenting Fellow.

Rachel’s Topics at the Social Intranet Summit:

The State of Community Management in 2011

Wednesday, September 28th at 1:30 PM

Community management is an essential part of optimizing a social approach to business and while it has existed for some time online, it is now becoming a mainstream discipline of general management as well as a specific role assigned to the person who does the front line engagement. As a result, the discipline is changing and maturing rapidly. Hear Rachel share the latest best practices and lessons learned, compiled from the leading practitioners in the space.

Community Management 101

Thursday, September 29th at 1:00 PM

The use of social technologies is fast approaching mainstream adoption but the process and management changes required to fully utilize the potential of these technologies has not caught up. Community management is an essential part of optimizing social approaches but as a discipline it is not universally well understood. Rachel will explore what community management is, the risks of not using it, and some best practices and examples.

Get to know Rachel

Recent choice tweets

Join us for the Social Intranet Summit

Read the full schedule for the Summit and Workshop, and register online now.

Posted in Events, Intranets  

Speaker profile: Shel Holtz, Communication + Technology, at Social Intranet Summit #SISV

Shel Holtz, Principal Holtz Communications + Technology

Shel Holtz is principal of Holtz Communication + Technology, which provides content and communication strategies for organizations’ online efforts. He has worked internationally with some of the largest organizations in the world. Shel has authored or co-authored six communication-focused books. He is the co-host of the first and longest-running PR podcast, “For Immediate Release.” He blogs at blog.holtz.com.

Shel’s Topic at the Social Intranet Summit:

Surviving Your Intranet’s Content Crisis: Content Curation on the Social Intranet

Wednesday, September 28th at 9:05 AM

There’s no shortage of talk about content curation on the web, but it has a place on your intranet, as well. With search functions suffering on many intranets, well curated content can make a huge difference in the value of the intranet. Employees who take the time to curate both internal and external content based on topics they care about can make it easier for their colleagues to find great content, spark more collaboration, and drive use of other internal social tools. In this session, Shel Holtz will dig into the content curation trend and explore some ways it can be applied to internal communications and employees’ day-to-day online activities.

Get to know Shel

Recent choice tweets

Join us for the Social Intranet Summit

Read the full schedule for the Summit and Workshop, and register online now.

Posted in Events, Intranets  

15 ways to engage users in building a new social intranet

Sign up for a free live demo of ThoughtFarmer. Get an inspiring glimpse at true employee engagement and meet one of our friendly social intranet experts.

Social intranets have changed the rules of successfully launching an intranet. While in the past it was quite helpful to involve employees throughout the process, today it’s a virtual necessity.

A social intranet becomes an online community space and employees need to feel a sense of involvement and ownership starting early in the project so they feel it really is their community.

While many of the opportunities for engagement listed below are standard practice for building a good 1.0 intranet, each one represents an opportunity to build a sense of shared ownership and create a shared sense of excitment over the coming change.

15 ways to engage users

1: Send out evaluation survey for old intranet.

If you’re building a new intranet, chances are the current/old one is no good. But you need a baseline of data to prove it. Try creating a simple survey about satisfcation with the current intranet. If you word questions carefully, you can re-apply the survey six months after you launch the new intranet and compare it to the baseline data about the old intranet. You can then continue to send out that same survey every 6-12 month to monitor satisfaction with the new intranet. Keep in mind that self-reported satisfaction surveys are not a complete approach to measuring the value of an intranet.

2: Hold focus groups about intranet problems.

Focus groups are a useful way to capture gripes about the current intranet and gather information about employee needs. Focus groups, as opposed to individual interviews or surveys, create shared experiences (“social” experiences, if you will) that help create a sense of connectedness among colleagues. This can start to lay the foundation for the sense of connectedness a social intranet will instill.

3: Interview key stakeholders early on.

Stakeholder interviews have been a key ingredient in intranet planning as long as intranets have been around. They are an opportunity to listen to leaders throughout the company and build relationships you’ll need throughout the project. Be sure to follow up with all interviewees on an ongoing basis to maintain their sense of involvement.

4: Observe employees in their daily workplace.

This technique is a secret of some of the best intranet managers in the world, but is standard practice for usability experts. Workplace observation gives the intranet team very real-world insights into how people work on a daily basis and the information and tools they use to do their jobs. It can provide much more realistic information than approaches that require participants to self-report.

5: Ask employees to post ideas for the new intranet.

James Robertson famously said “don’t ask users what they need on the intranet” (see James’ blog post on the topic). While that’s a good motto for intranet managers, it can’t hurt to ask people for ideas for the new intranet. Be clear that no idea is gauranteed to make it into the final product, but give people the chance to share their thoughts. You may discover brilliant and innovative ideas the intranet team wouldn’t have come up with.

It is important to set clear expectations about a process like this. Up front, explain how ideas will be vetted and what rewards or prizes will be given, if any. Try to hold this process in an open online space where employees can see and comment on or contribute to colleagues’ ideas.

6: Create a group for content owners.

As soon as you start the project to build a new intranet, get cozy with your content owners. Even on a social intranet, good content is critical for success. Intranet manager Tanis Roadhouse highlighted the need to “treat content owners like royalty” in her blueprint for building a social intranet.

7: Involve key employees in product evaluation.

Finding the right social intranet software is as much art as it is science. As important as meeting business and technical requirements is the need to find a good cultural fit. Strategically select employees to involve in the product evaluation process. Don’t make them scour complex requirements spreadsheets, but do give them demo access if it’s an option and let them get their hands dirty. Consider involving content owners in this process and listen very closely to their feedback.

8: Run a contest to name the new intranet.

Holding a contest to name the new intranet can build excitement and build the brand of the new intranet. You’ll want a structured process that’s timed right to fit into the rest of the intranet project. See our case study of crowdsourcing the name for a new social intranet for specific ideas on how to implement a naming contest.

A naming committee can either be the governing group that oversees the naming contest or an alterntative to the naming process. A company’s culture, the project timeline, or other factors may make a naming committee a better way to select a name for the new intranet than a naming contest. The naming committee could include stakeholders, content owners, and even an executive.

9: Hold voting on graphic design alternatives.

If your intranet project includes the time and budget to compare several design alternatives, this can be a great opportunity to involve employees. Create a simple system for people to vote or comment on two or three different design concepts and be clear from the start about how employee voices will be weighed.

10: Inventory content on old intranet.

This may be the least glamorous way to involve users, but it’s one of the most critical for building an effective new intranet. Usually the content owners conduct the content inventories, guided by the intranet team. This can be a time consuming process, so be sure to start it early and provide plenty of support and cupcakes to the content owners who’ll be doing it.

Alternatively, the intranet project team members can conduct the content inventories themselves, but then work closely with content owners to review the results.

11: Run online card sorting.

Card sorting is a tried and true tool for building user-friendly intranet navigations. Our Senior User Experience Designer, Selma Zafar, prefers to use Optimal Sort for online card sorting – an online tool that lets you gather results quickly and from far-flung locations in a way paper card sorting can’t.

Card sorting can be an opportunity to involve a very large group of employees in a substantive way. You can read about intranet manager Luke Mepham and how he involved 1,200 global employees in card sorting for an intranet redesign project.

If you’re new to card sorting, check out Donna Spencer’s blog post Card sorting: a definitive guide for oodles of concrete tips and hints.

12: Run online task testing.

Task testing is another standard tool in the User Experience Designer’s toolbox and can follow a card sorting effort. While card sorting helps you understand how employees group content in their minds, task testing lets you test how well a draft intranet navigation helps employees complete actual daily work tasks. We like to use Treejack for online task testing. This can allow you to engage large numbers of users, including those in remote locations.

13: Run user testing on mockups or pilot site.

User testing is similar to task testing, but happens on a live site or mockups that include page layouts and some graphic design elements. User testing provides a third round of validation for the navigation structure you are creating for your new intranet and can inform the layout of pages. It involves a smaller group than task testing and card sorting and is a little harder to do remotely.

14: Create pilot groups on new intranet.

If your project timeline allows it, include a period for pilot groups to test out your new social intranet. Most social intranet software includes features for groups (communities, teams, etc) to work together online. Carefully select groups for the pilot phase. Try starting with teams or employee communities that are either tech savvy already or that are most in need of online collaboration tools. Be sure to listen carefully to your pilot users and treat them as partners. The pilot effort can provide critical insights into how to launch and manage group pages and pilot users may become active champions who help with adoption after launch.

15: Identify community managers for early adopter groups.

A key component of social intranets is community spaces and a key success factor for online communities is having effective community managers. A community manager is like a content gardener, an online facilitator and a sherpa. By building a community management strategy into your intranet plan you can increase the chances of adoption of the new social intranet and ensure employees get real value out of it.

As you identify communities that could benefit from your new social intranet, reach out to staff members whom you think would make good community managers and provide them plenty of guidance and resources. If community management is a critical part of your adoption strategy, check out the Community Roundtable, a group of community managers who share best practice stories and hear from experts in the field.

The means ARE the ends

The end results most people seek from their social intranets are high levels of connection, knowledge sharing, and employee engagement. The best way to achieve this is to take a truly collaborative approach to planning and launching your social intranet. The means you use to implement the project from the beginning will be reflected in the ends you achieve.

Posted in Featured, Intranets, Social software  

Meet the speakers: Stowe Boyd, Web Anthropologist, at Social Intranet Summit #SISV

Stowe Boyd, Web Anthropologist

Stowe is an internationally recognized authority on social tools and their impact on media, business, and society. He is best known for his commentary on the social revolution at www.stoweboyd.com, and his public speaking on his research on work media, social business, the social web, publicy, social cognition, networked identity, and the future of work. Stowe is at work on a new book about the rise of a socially augmented world, called ‘A Liquid, Not A Solid; A City, Not A Machine’.

Stowe’s Topic at the Social Intranet Summit:

Trust, Tasks, And Twitter: What Social Cognition Research Tells Us About Working Together

Wednesday, September 28th at 3:00 PM

Research in recent years has shed new light on the biochemistry and cognitive psychology of human interaction, with some startling and often counter-intuitive findings. Why does adding smart people to small groups not improve performance? Why are short-term, ‘Hollywood’-style projects so effective? How does sharing task progress lead to happiness? What are the benefits of having friends at work? Does Twitter make people smarter? Stowe will walk through a broad collection of research on social cognition, and show how social tools seem natural because they line up with the structure of our minds and innate social connection.

Get to know Stowe

Recent choice tweets

@stoweboyd: Rise Of Rōnin and The Liquid Economy sto.ly/o8vJy4 We are headed for an economy dominated by short-term freelance work. 8 Sep

@stoweboyd: The half life of a bitly link is about 3 hours http://sto.ly/q0CiH8 although I bet it will be getting shorter as the web gets denser. 7 Sep

@stoweboyd: The Conference Board reports only 51% of US workers are interested in their work, down 19% from 1987http://www.shareable.net/blog/the-state-of-gen-y6 Sep

@stoweboyd: A New Etiquette For Modern Communication sto.ly/pXxJin Some will think I’m rude to say we have no obligation to respond. Get over it. 1 Sep

Join us for the Social Intranet Summit

Read the full schedule for the Summit and Workshop, and register online now.

Posted in Events, Intranets  

Client webinar: Using ThoughtFarmer to find experts

This Wednesday, September 7th at 10:00am Pacific / 1:00pm Eastern join ThoughtFarmer Co-Creator Chris McGrath for the first in a series of client webinars: Using ThoughtFarmer to Find Experts.

The webinar will include how-tos on using custom profile fields, tagging, Active Directory syncing, and employee directory templates. You’ll have the opportunity to interact and ask detailed questions so you learn exactly what you need to know.

This free webinar is open to non-clients as well, for whom it will offer a sneak peak at ThoughtFarmer’s inner workings.

Register now (free)

New webinar series for ThoughtFarmer clients

ThoughtFarmer contains powerful features that are sometimes overlooked. This webinar is the first in our new monthly webinar series designed to help clients take full advantage of the investments they’ve made in ThoughtFarmer.

The ThoughtFarmer Client Webinar series is every first Wednesday of each month at 10:00 AM Pacific.

Posted in Events, Intranets, ThoughtFarmer  

ThoughtFarmer 2011 Best Intranet Competition

As part of the Social Intranet Summit in Vancouver (Wed, Sept 28), ThoughtFarmer is holding the 2011 Best Intranet Competition for ThoughtFarmer clients. The competition has three categories and winners will be announced at the post-summit intranet administrator workshop on Thursday, September 29th.

Best Intranet Competition

There are three categories: Best-looking, Most innovative, and Best collaboration.

This competition gives us the opportunity to recognize and share stories from ThoughtFarmer clients who are exploring the full potential of social intranets. To join the competition, simply submit a screenshot and a 250-word description!

Learn more about the competition

Entry deadline: Friday, September 23rd, 2011

Posted in Events, Intranets, ThoughtFarmer  

Information Management: “ThoughtFarmer Social Intranet Connects with Staff”

Information Management interviewed ThoughtFarmer client Mountain Equipment Co-op (MEC) about their successful social intranet in a new article “Social Intranet Connects with Staff.” From the article:

By fostering employee use and making certain communications more efficient, management at outdoor gear retailer Mountain Equipment Co-op finds that workers are engaged as never before and using a system that caught on and took off in a way the company never imagined.

MEC is based in Vancouver. The retail co-op started in 1971 selling climbing equipment and has since expanded to all kinds of adventure supplies. It now has more than 1,500 employees in 14 retail locations. In what was first seen as a way to centralize information for employees, MEC adopted a social intranet.

Intranets have traditionally struggled as hotbeds of social activity, so practicality comes first. MEC employees use a platform from ThoughtFarmer called Mondo for checking schedules, requesting time off and reordering items. But once employee needs and behavior were understood, it also became a home to popular forums and interest groups. Mondo, administrators say, was functional out of the box, but more success came with customization for MEC staff.

In the six-month period from October to March 2011, users created 9451 pages, made 7932 comments and attached 3198 documents. MEC is now experiencing average usage levels of 85 percent of employees logging in on a regular basis.

Read the complete article.

 

Posted in Featured, Intranets, ThoughtFarmer  

What is a social intranet? The definitive explanation.

Sign up for a free live demo of ThoughtFarmer. Get an inspiring glimpse at true employee engagement and meet one of our friendly social intranet experts.

First, what is an intranet?

Definition: An internal website that helps employees get stuff done.

See our full blog post defining “intranet” for a detailed explanation and a fun bit of controversy in the comments.

Next, what is “social”?

“Social” may be the most overused word in technology today. I think you’d find, though, that the average businessperson would struggle to define “social software” and “social media”, resorting to feeble references to Twitter and Facebook.

Social is really just about people interacting with each other. “Social software” is software that enables users to interact with each other. “Social media” is content (“media”) published by a bunch of people who can interact with each other and the content. An “ice cream social” is a party where people interact with each other while eating ice cream. (Given the choice, I’d pick an ice cream social over any other kind of social, any day.)

Definition of “social intranet”

So, to the point of this post. The definitive explanation of a “social intranet”:

An intranet where all employees can author content and connect easily

It takes two things to make an intranet social:

  1. Authorship: The ability for everyone to create content
  2. Connections: The ability to see the people behind the content and to connect with them in some meaningful way

Traditional intranets have very narrow authorship, restricted to a small handful with official “editor” permission. Traditional intranets also lack connections. Content is basically anonymous and shows no social context, no connection between pages and specific people.

A social intranet allows all employees to author rich content, connects every piece of content to a specific, living and breathing person, and helps people connect with each other. On a social intranet the “people layer” permeates the entire site and makes every page more personal and more human.

Origin of the term “social intranet”

I’m proud to say that I coined the term “social intranet” back in early 2009. Well, it might have been Darren (our CEO). Or maybe we both cried out the term in unison during a moment of epiphany in a meeting. We can’t quite remember which one of us it was, except that we both erupted in enthusiasm when we realized we had captured the term that explained what ThoughtFarmer was (and is). I suppose we should have recorded the event and ran to the trademark office. In any event, we’re pleased the term has taken off.

Not about specific tech tools

We’ve seen some interesting definitions of “social intranet”, some that are too complex and others that define the term based on the specific software tools that have thus far been popular on social intranets (such as blogs, wikis, activity streams, etc.).

Those definitions can be helpful, but limit themselves with reliance on specific technology and formats. Just because you don’t have a blog on your intranet doesn’t mean it’s not social. And the specific tools available next year may not be on this year’s list.

Who knows what new enterprise technology will be common on the intranet of the future? We’re not sure. But we’re pretty sure wide authorship and the formation of connections will be at the core. What really matters is that social intranets humanize the workplace and give every employee a face and a voice.

Posted in Featured, Intranets, Social software  

Case study: Crowdsourcing the name for a new social intranet

Ephraim Freed used to be the intranet manager at Oxfam America. Today he guest blogs for ThoughtFarmer and helps clients effectively prepare and launch their ThoughtFarmer intranets. This story is about how Oxfam America named its intranet.

At Oxfam America, we wanted employees to feel a sense of ownership over the new social intranet, so we had them choose the name themselves. We crowdsourced the name in a structured way that involved employees from around the globe and gave every employee a voice and a vote.

Business need: Unite a globally dispersed staff

At Oxfam America in 2008 we were using a vanilla implementation of SharePoint 2003 (SPPS anyone?) for our intranet and needed much more. The site’s information architecture represented many intranet worst practices and the search engine had been disabled due to security issues in SharePoint 2003. Text dominated the homepage and other parts of the site, most of which were used for simple document libraries only. People continually complained about how unfriendly the site was for even basic tasks and we had no training material.

Old Oxfam America intranet

In addition to technical and content issues we struggled to feel a sense of kinship across geographic distances. Like many global organizations, each office felt a little like its own separate company. For an innovative global nonprofit that sought to empower people living in poverty around the world, this somewhat disempowering intranet just felt wrong.

So we decided to build a new intranet that could unite employees from around the world and help the organization build a new sense of shared purpose and connection. From day one the CEO wanted the new intranet to be “alive, vibrant, and active.”

At the time I was the Intranet Project Lead and realized that in order to reach the CEO’s goal we would need to engage employees in the project in every way possible. Choosing the name for the new intranet provided a ripe opportunity for this.

Structured crowdsourcing process with 5 steps

Before we started the voting process I had come up with a clever name I liked. But I knew this couldn’t be my intranet – it had to be our intranet. So we laid out a clear process for selecting a new intranet name and moved it forward using our old intranet.

STEP 1 – Offered a simple prize (and recognition)

We offered neither money nor time off to the winner of the competition. Instead we offered public recognition within the company and a t-shirt from my favorite boutique clothier, Johnny Cupcakes. So the prize was basically just recognition. This avoided any concerns about favoritism or inequity, but was enough to motivate employees to participate.

STEP 2 – Collected name suggestions

We created a section on the old intranet where employees could post name suggestions. We set a deadline to suggest names and then communicated the hell out of it. All name suggestions were visible to all employees and we set no limit on the number of names an employee could suggest. After a two week period we ended the name suggestion phase with great results. Employees from almost every office had submitted suggestions and even the Senior Vice President threw his hat in the ring.

STEP 3 – Reviewed submissions

While the overall process was very open, we didn’t include every suggested name in the voting phase. Instead, a small committee reviewed all the suggested names and removed from the list any that seemed inappropriate or silly. For example, while the suggestion of “Unicorn Kisses” brought out the LOLs, we didn’t consider it a serious option.

STEP 4 – Voting on a scale

We sent a survey out to all employees with the narrowed down list of names. Instead of offering simply “yes” or “no” voting, we created a scale on which people could rate each suggested name. This offered the opportunity to identify the most popular names, but also exposed the most polarizing suggestions.

The voting scale included:

  • Love it
  • Like it
  • Neutral
  • Don’t like it
  • Please no!

We left the voting open for two weeks and communicated plentifully with employees to encourage high turn-out.

STEP 5 – Analysis and selection

Because we used a rating scale rather than simple yes/no voting, the final name selection required some analysis. For example, the name I suggested, “VIRGO” (VIRtual Global Office), received the highest number of “Love it” votes, but also received a lot of votes for “Don’t like it” and “Please no!”

Conversely, the suggested name “Padare,” which means “community space” in the Zimbabwean language of Shona, won a few less votes for “Love it” but got more votes for “Like it” and received very few negative votes.

So we chose “Padare” as the winner because it had the greatest overall positive response. We announced the name along with a definition of the word “Padare” and I had the privilege of buying the Johnny Cupcakes t-shirt for the winner myself. The winner chose a Boston Celtics themed design which I happily hand-delivered when he next visited the Boston office.

Definition of Padare

Setting the tone for the new intranet

While it could have gone differently, the winning name came from an employee outside of headquarters – someone from our Southern Africa office. This simple fact set a stake in the ground to guide the rest of the project and symbolized the empowerment the new social intranet would provide to employee voices.

I remember two years after the official launch of the intranet hearing from employees that they felt a sense of ownership over Padare, which is something we rarely get to say about enterprise software applications.

It can be surprising how small things like this influence the feel and trajectory of a project. The naming process required no additional money or resources and provided an opportunity to get employees excited about the new intranet. Generally when we see that one of our colleagues has a voice within the company, it increases the sense of voice and involvement for the rest of us.

However, this process may not be right for every company. I recently spoke to a company that asked employees for suggested names for the new intranet, but didn’t get any that worked well. The process I’ve outlined worked at Oxfam America, but each company must find a process that fits its own culture and goals.

Epilogue: What’s Bourbon got to do with it?

As an aside, I want to mention a high point that came after the name was selected. Before the naming process finished I made a bet with a buddy of mine in the office. He told me that “no matter what the name is, people will call it ‘the intranet.’

I firmly believed in the importance of branding the new social intranet and investing in it a personality and meaning beyond its simple features. So I bet my buddy a bottle of good Bourbon that within three months people would routinely call the new intranet by its chosen name, whatever it would be.

Throughout the entire launch process we referred to the intranet as “Padare” and even used active language such as “Padare lets any employee post to the news section,” which made Padare into an actor rather than just a place or application.

Padare Homepage

Sure enough, at an all-staff meeting three months after the official launch of the new intranet the President, COO, and HR Department each referred to “Padare,” never once mentioning “the intranet.” True to his word my friend conceded the win to me and brought in a bottle of Knob Creek.

The branding campaign was so successful, in fact, that up until the day I left Oxfam America colleagues referred to me as “Papa Padare” and “Padre Padare” on a daily basis. I even saw nicknames for Padare itself. The day I noticed someone had a browser shortcut to “Padare” titled “Pad Thai” I felt a sense of accomplishment. The new intranet had such a character of its own that colleagues even gave it their own personal nicknames.

For inspiration around intranet names, see the previous ThoughtFarmer post What to name your intranet?

Posted in Customer Stories, Intranets  

81 Intranet Governance Questions to Ask Yourself

Sign up for a free live demo of ThoughtFarmer. Get an inspiring glimpse at true employee engagement and meet one of our friendly social intranet experts.

Intranet governance, especially social intranet governance, is tough. We believe intranet governance matters and that it is a crucial factor in the success or failure of an intranet implementation.

We help our ThoughtFarmer clients in their intranet roll-outs by doing a review of some basic governance topics, providing links to some great resources from folks like Martin White, James Robertson, Maish Nichani, and Toby Ward, and by asking a lot of questions. I’ve compiled some of the big questions that we find lead to important discussions when it comes to intranet governance and management. While long, it’s by no means an exhaustive list — as always, we appreciate hearing what questions you’ve found helpful in making your own intranet decision-making process that much better.

PROJECT VS PROGRAM

  • Are you running an intranet project (new intranet, redesign of an intranet, re-launch) or a program (ongoing intranet operations, day to day initiatives)?
  • Does your organization govern projects and programs differently?
  • Have you thought about the difference between the two?
  • If you’re running an intranet project, have you thought about how you will make the transition to program/operations once your project is complete?

SPONSORSHIP/LEADERSHIP

  • Who is your project/program sponsor(s)? Are they able to approve funding and resources?
  • Is your project/program sponsor an individual or a group of individuals?
  • Is your project/program sponsor, “the end of the line” or do you have a decision maker(s) that they report to?
  • Who is the most senior-level person responsible for advocating for the usage of the intranet? What degree of influence and authority does this person have? Do you feel it’s enough, given your intranet strategy?

GOVERNANCE

  • Who establishes and maintains the governance structure?
  • Who grants authority for governance?
  • Does your organization have a larger entity that governs projects, portfolios, programs? Are you a part of that structure? How do you fit into their governance structure?

INTRANET STRATEGY

  • Do you have an intranet strategy?
  • Have you consulted others in the creation of the intranet strategy?
  • Is your intranet strategy signed off?
  • Do you know how to get your intranet strategy signed-off?
  • Have you informed others about the contents of the intranet strategy?
  • Do others (from Executive to front-line staff) understand how the intranet strategy will impact them?
  • Who is responsible for making changes to the intranet strategy?
  • How often do you get an opportunity to review your intranet strategy and ensure that it’s still effective and relevant?
  • How are you helping others make day-to-day decisions around content and communications on the intranet that align with the strategy?
  • Who is evaluating whether or not the intranet strategy is a success? How often does that happen? What kind of assurance mechanisms do you have included in your intranet strategy?

DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONS

  • Who is responsible for resolving conflicts, issues, and risks that occur around the intranet and its operations?
  • Who keeps track of the progress made on the intranet?
  • What’s the process for prioritizing intranet initiatives? Who decides on what’s next in the queue?
  • Who is responsible for communicating the intranet’s success to the governance structure and the rest of the organization? How often does that happen?

STANDARDS/POLICIES

  • How is content decided upon? Do you have a set of intranet policies, procedures, and standards?
  • What other organizational polices, procedures, and standards do you need to take into account for your intranet? Privacy? Security? IT? Brand/identity standards? Legal?
  • How have you integrated the other policies with your intranet policy?

CONTENT

  • Who is responsible for the information architecture and content strategy of your intranet?
  • Who is able to author, edit, and publish content?
  • Who is able to leave comments?
  • Who is able to blog?
  • Who is able to create different content types (calendars, blogs, surveys, discussion forums)?
  • Who is able to remove, archive, or delete content from the intranet?
  • How is the content strategy communicated to staff, so they understand what type of content to create?
  • How are content standards upheld? Who is responsible for quality control of content on the intranet?

COMMUNICATIONS

  • Who is responsible for designing the communication strategy for your intranet?
  • What different delivery channels within your intranet are being used for formal news-type content?
  • Who are the different audiences that communications needs to reach within your organization? How are they different? What are their information and attention constraints?

COLLABORATION

  • Does your organization have an explicit collaboration strategy? If yes, who is the owner of that strategy? What is your relationship with that owner? Are they a part of your governance structure?
  • How does the intranet play a part in the collaboration strategy? If there are gaps, how could the intranet play a part in that strategy? What are the opportunities?
  • Who is responsible for supporting teams and projects as they use the intranet to collaborate?
  • Do you have pre-defined intranet spaces or collections of project templates and artifacts to assist teams in collaborating on the intranet?
  • Does your intranet have a space where employees can share their “collaboration lessons learned” to help improve overall organizational collaboration practices?

IT ENVIRONMENT

  • Where is your intranet hosted? Do you know who is responsible for its operations?
  • What happens when there is an outage to your intranet?
  • How do you deal with planned outages, upgrades, and scheduled maintenance?
  • Who is responsible for the implementation of user accounts and security models within the rest of the organization?
  • Does your intranet rely on a single user directory?
  • Are you consulted about changes to that user directory and security model?
  • What line-of-business applications (HR, financial, CRM, etc.) does your intranet need to integrate with?
  • Do you know the business and technical owners of your organization’s line of business applications?
  • Are you consulted or informed around decision-making for line of business applications?
  • Do you share a common IT environment with internal applications?
  • Do you share a common user interface design standard for internal web-based applications?

MEASUREMENT

  • Who is responsible for determining key performance indicators and measuring the success of the intranet?
  • Who communicates the success throughout the different organizational groups?
  • If your intranet is not meeting its goals, what is your decision making process around strategy, improvements, and changes?

Have any other favourite governance questions? Leave them in the comments below.

Posted in Intranets  

Want us to stay in touch?


Have a question for us?

We'd love to answer it for you! Call 1-888-694-3999 or fill out our contact form and we'll respond right away.