<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter traffic better than Google traffic? Not for us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/17/twitter-traffic-better-than-google-traffic-not-for-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/17/twitter-traffic-better-than-google-traffic-not-for-us/</link>
	<description>Social Intranet Software: ThoughtFarmer is Turnkey, Microsoft Certified</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/17/twitter-traffic-better-than-google-traffic-not-for-us/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 13:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/?p=1720#comment-783</guid>
		<description>Ephraim, I should have mentioned that we analyzed New Visitors only. That means people like you weren&#039;t included in the results. We realized that would have skewed things even more in Google&#039;s favour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ephraim, I should have mentioned that we analyzed New Visitors only. That means people like you weren&#8217;t included in the results. We realized that would have skewed things even more in Google&#8217;s favour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EphraimJF</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/17/twitter-traffic-better-than-google-traffic-not-for-us/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>EphraimJF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/?p=1720#comment-770</guid>
		<description>In reviewing this post I asked myself &quot;well, why do I click on links in ThoughtFarmer tweets?&quot; 

This led to the questions: Why are other people clicking on TF tweets? and who are these people? 

My first assumption is that 1) people who are following TF already know it or 2) people who read TF tweets and follow the links aren&#039;t really sure of what TF does prior to clicking on the link. 

#1 explains me. I follow TF on Twitter and when I see a blog post teaser that I think might be valuable in building up my intranet/technology/strategy knowledge base, I click the link, scan the page and read the whole thing if my scan suggests high knowledge building value. I don&#039;t click around the site because I&#039;m very familiar with it and I don&#039;t convert because I&#039;m already converted. 

I guess this begs the question, how many of your Twitter visitors are repeat visitors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reviewing this post I asked myself &#8220;well, why do I click on links in ThoughtFarmer tweets?&#8221; </p>
<p>This led to the questions: Why are other people clicking on TF tweets? and who are these people? </p>
<p>My first assumption is that 1) people who are following TF already know it or 2) people who read TF tweets and follow the links aren&#8217;t really sure of what TF does prior to clicking on the link. </p>
<p>#1 explains me. I follow TF on Twitter and when I see a blog post teaser that I think might be valuable in building up my intranet/technology/strategy knowledge base, I click the link, scan the page and read the whole thing if my scan suggests high knowledge building value. I don&#8217;t click around the site because I&#8217;m very familiar with it and I don&#8217;t convert because I&#8217;m already converted. </p>
<p>I guess this begs the question, how many of your Twitter visitors are repeat visitors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/17/twitter-traffic-better-than-google-traffic-not-for-us/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/?p=1720#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Dragos! I still maintain that Google is going to be a better lead source for most companies. However, your moral is good too: Look at your metrics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Dragos! I still maintain that Google is going to be a better lead source for most companies. However, your moral is good too: Look at your metrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragos ILINCA</title>
		<link>http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/blog/2010/02/17/twitter-traffic-better-than-google-traffic-not-for-us/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragos ILINCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thoughtfarmer.com/?p=1720#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Very good point. 

It&#039;s good to see other people sharing some metrics. As I said in our article, I was shocked about the results we have on uberVU as well. I was expecting the results you got, because they make more sense. 

The moral of the story is, in my opinion, not that Google is king. It&#039;s not even to beware the hype. What I personally learned by looking at the metrics is that before coming to a conclusion, you should measure and look at the numbers. In your case, the numbers confirmed your assumptions. In our case, the numbers did the opposite. 

In any case, we probably both know more about our users now than before looking at the numbers and just going by popular belief.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to see other people sharing some metrics. As I said in our article, I was shocked about the results we have on uberVU as well. I was expecting the results you got, because they make more sense. </p>
<p>The moral of the story is, in my opinion, not that Google is king. It&#8217;s not even to beware the hype. What I personally learned by looking at the metrics is that before coming to a conclusion, you should measure and look at the numbers. In your case, the numbers confirmed your assumptions. In our case, the numbers did the opposite. </p>
<p>In any case, we probably both know more about our users now than before looking at the numbers and just going by popular belief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

